Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
The IIAW Blog
Blog Home All Blogs

Big I Buzz - October 8, 2025

Posted By Kim Fiene, Wednesday, October 8, 2025

 

Happy Wednesday! In this week’s Big I Buzz: an update on claims processing timelines from Wisconsin OCI, and a look at how wealthy consumers are shaping the auto insurance market.


Wisconsin OCI Bulletin: Claim Processing Timelines

The Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance recently issued a bulletin to property and casualty insurers and Interested parties to remind insurers of the 30-day time to process claims.


Timely claims handling is critical, as it helps consumers meet important deadlines for FEMA funding eligibility. Read the bulletin here.


Wealthy Consumers Drive the Auto Insurance Market in 2025

A new study from The Zebra reveals that affluent consumers are fueling the auto insurance market through increased spending and luxury vehicle ownership. Since 2020, insurance shopping for top luxury cars has surged 116%, while luxury insurance rates have climbed 56% over the past five years—compared to 41% for non-luxury vehicles.


According to the study, the top 10% of spenders now account for a disproportionate share of the industry’s overall growth. Read more here.



For more news, check out the Action News section of our weekly e-newsletter, Big I Buzz. If you aren’t subscribed, click here to add your email to our emailing list.

Tags:  big i buzz  insuring Wisconsin  OCI  personal lines  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Big I Buzz - August 27, 2025

Posted By Kim Fiene, Wednesday, August 27, 2025

 

Happy Wednesday! In this week’s Big I Buzz: aggressive shopping trends for home and auto coverage, and a federal judge halts upcoming changes to the health insurance marketplace.


TransUnion: Aggressive Shopping Continues for Home, Auto Coverage

Consumers are shopping for auto and property insurance at elevated rates, according to TransUnion’s Q3 2025 Insurance Personal Lines Trends and Perspectives report.

  • Auto: Shopping activity rose 17.6% in Q2 2025 compared to the previous year.
  • Property: Up 9.2% year-over-year.

The report notes that consumers seeking auto coverage should continue to find competitive options as carriers prioritize new business. On the property side, the report highlights four key customer segments most likely to shop for coverage in the current market. Read more here.


US Judge Pauses Changes to Federal Health Insurance Marketplace

On August 22, a federal judge halted portions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ planned updates to the Affordable Care Act marketplace—just days before implementation.


Judge Brendan Hurson sided with a lawsuit filed by the city of Chicago, the mayor and city council of Baltimore, and public health advocates. The challengers argued that the changes would cause more than 2 million people to lose coverage due to increased fees and other barriers. Read more here.

 

 

For more news, check out the Action News section of our weekly e-newsletter, Big I Buzz. If you aren’t subscribed, click here to add your email to our emailing list.

Tags:  big i buzz  government affairs  insuring Wisconsin  personal lines  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Big I Buzz - March 19, 2025

Posted By Kim Fiene, Wednesday, March 19, 2025

 

Happy Wednesday! In this week's Big I Buzz: The Wisconsin OCI has issued a bulletin on AI use in insurance. Plus, Wisconsin ranks among the least safe states to drive in.


Wisconsin OCI Bulletin: The Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Insurance

The Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) issued a bulletin on March 18 to remind all entities regulated by OCI that decisions or actions impacting consumers that are made or supported by advanced analytical and computational technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, must comply with all applicable insurance laws and regulations. Read the bulletin here.


How Does Wisconsin Rank for Driving?

Wisconsin drivers face a mix of road conditions, from snow to heavy rain, but a recent study ranked the state in the bottom half for overall driving experience.


WalletHub analyzed all 50 states based on key factors like gas prices, traffic congestion, and safety. Wisconsin ranked 32nd overall, but 44th in safety—placing it among the worst in the country.


The study also highlighted gas price differences, with the West Coast seeing the highest prices and Mississippi the lowest. Read more here.



For more news, check out the Action News section of our weekly e-newsletter, Big I Buzz. If you aren’t subscribed, click here to add your email to our emailing list.

Tags:  big i buzz  insuring Wisconsin  OCI  personal lines  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Join the IIAW's Task Forces & Councils

Posted By Kaylyn Staudt, Thursday, July 21, 2022

Join the IIAW's Councils and Task Forces Today: s.pointerpro.com/volunteertoserve

The IIAW is looking for volunteers to serve on the IIAW's councils and task forces. Each council and task force will act as a sounding board for the IIAW and will only have three virtual meetings per year. Participation in the IIAW task forces and councils gives you exclusive access to industry experts, exclusive networking events and FREE CE opportunities during most virtual meetings when content allows. 

Opportunities for 2022-2023 include: 

• Personal Lines Task Force - this task force is for individuals interested in or who have a role in Personal Lines insurance

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 10/27/22, 3/2/23 and 7/13/23

10/27 Meeting Topic: Replacement Cost: Determining Values for Personal Lines Customers

• Commercial Lines Task Force - for individuals who are interested in or who have a role in Commercial Lines insurance

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 10/26/22, 3/1/23 and 7/12/23

10/26 Meeting Topic: WC Rate Decrease Overview

• Employee Benefits Task Force - for individuals who are interested in or who have a role in Employee Benefits

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 11/3/22, 3/9/23 and 7/20/23

11/3 Meeting Topic: E&O Claims in Employee Benefits

• Industry Relations & Operations Council - for insurance professionals who have an operational or leadership role within an agency or company

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 11/1/22, 3/7/22 and 7/18/23

10/27 Meeting Topic: Budgeting & Planning for 2023

• Government Affairs Council - for individuals interested in staying informed and providing feedback to the IIAW's Board on Wisconsin and national legislative and political happenings. 

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 10/25/22, 2/28/23 and 7/11/23

10/25 Meeting Topic: Election Preview & Update

• Emerging Leaders - For insurance professionals looking to cultivate their skills for a successful career by engaging in association activities, professional development, education and events

Virtual Meetings from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on 11/2/22, 3/8/23 and 7/19/23

11/2 Meeting Topic: Cyber Liability Market Update

We will be hosting a kickoff event on September 21st for the IIAW councils and task forces to plan for the coming year. This meeting is free and open for all interested in joining a task force or council. Make sure you visit the below link to join so you will receive communications regarding this kickoff event and other task forces & councils information. Additional event details to come.

Join the IIAW's Councils and Task Forces Today: s.pointerpro.com/volunteertoserve

Tags:  commercial lines  emerging leaders  employee benefits  government affairs  IIAW councils  IIAW task forces  industry relations  personal lines 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Personal Lines - Understanding the Unique Facets of Flood Insurance: Flood Policy Forms

Posted By IIAW Staff, Thursday, May 19, 2022
Updated: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

 

By: Chris Boggs, Big "I" Executive Director of Risk Management and Education

 

This article was originally published within the VU Research Library here August 2021.

 

Compared to more common property insurance policies, National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policy forms are quite intriguing. First, the Federal government wrote them; and second, they use terms and conditions not found in other property policy forms. The three NFIP coverage forms are highlighted in the following paragraphs.

 

Three Policy Forms

 

Each Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) form issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) specifies the terms, conditions, and agreement between FEMA (as the insurer) and the named insured. Major provisions are essentially the same among the three forms with the only differences being the qualifications for coverage, the limits available and the property valuation methods applied.

 

Dwelling Form

 

Approximately 85 percent of current NFIP policies are written using the dwelling form. It is designed for one- to-four-family structures primarily occupied as a residence. Homeowners, residential renters, owners of two-to-four-unit residential structures, residential townhouse or row house owners, and the owner of an individual unit in a condominium building are eligible for the dwelling form.

 

Property insured on the dwelling form is valued at replacement cost provided two requirements are met:

• Property is insured to at least 80 percent of

   its value or the maximum coverage

   available—whichever is less; and

• The insured lives in the residence at least

   80 percent of the year.

 

If either of these requirements is not met, the most the insured is going to receive is the property's actual cash value (ACV).

 

Although the policy states that replacement cost is paid if 80 percent of the value is carried, this is not a coinsurance form, it is an “insurance-to-value" form.

 

Like the homeowners' form, the SFIP dwelling form pays the greater of actual cash value or the amount developed in the insurance-to-value calculation; but only if the insured lives at the residence 80 percent of the year. If both conditions are not met, losses are paid at actual cash value. These caveats are why this is not the equivalent of a coinsurance form.

 

In regular program communities, coverage for buildings and contents is limited to a specified maximum. Current (as of August 2021) maximum limits are $250,000 on the structure and $100,000 on contents (which applies to renters as well).


General Property Form

 

Owners or lessees of “other residential" and nonresidential structures or units are eligible for protection under the General Property Form. Residential structures with five or more units, hotels or motels, apartment buildings, cooperative condominiums, assisted living facilities and dormitories are examples of “other residential" structures insurable on the general property form. Nonresidential structures, as is evidenced by the name, are any structures where people do not live and includes stores, office buildings, manufacturing facilities, warehouses, churches, schools, detached garages, commercial condominiums, and any other eligible structure not normally considered a place of residence.

 

Structures and contents insured on the general property form are valued at actual cash value with no other option available.

 

Maximum limits differ depending on the classification of the structure. “Other residential" structures are limited to a maximum of $500,000 on the structure and $100,000 on the contents. Nonresidential structures are eligible for maximum limits up to $500,000 on the building and another $500,000 for the contents. (As of August 2021.)

 

Residential Condominium Building Association Policy (RCBAP)

 

The Residential Condominium Building Association Policy (RCBAP) provides building coverage and, if desired, can be used to provide contents coverage for common use personal property for residential condominium buildings, provided 75 percent or more of the building is residential use. Coverage is written in the name of the association for the benefit of the association and the unit owners. Only buildings with a condominium form of ownership are eligible for this coverage form. The unit owners must take title and deed to specific units.

 

Cooperative condominiums are not eligible for the RCBAP as title to a specific unit is not passed to the occupier of the unit; an “owner" buys stock in the cooperative and is allowed to live in a particular unit (based on the amount of stock purchased). Timeshare buildings may be eligible for the RCBAP if condominium-style ownership is offered in jurisdictions which allow that title to individual units be vested in the owners' names (a fee simple-type arrangement allowing the title to be transferred to heirs).

 

Property insured on the RCBAP is valued at replacement cost. In fact, this is the only form that offers a true insurance-to-value (coinsurance) clause similar to the homeowners' or commercial property policy.

 

Much higher limits are available for buildings insurable under the RCBAP. Up to $250,000 per unit, per building is available. For example, an insured can purchase up to $2.5 million in protection for a 10-unit building. Coverage for commonly owned personal property is limited to $100,000 per building.

Tags:  insuring Wisconsin  personal lines  personal lines coverage  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Personal Lines - The PAP and College Students

Posted By IIAW Staff, Friday, November 12, 2021
Updated: Wednesday, December 1, 2021

By: Bill Wilson, Founder & CEO of InsuranceCommentary.com

Your 20-year-old daughter is away at college. She does not have a car on campus, but her roommate does and she drives the auto occasionally. Would your unendorsed personal auto policy respond if she has an accident driving the car? If not, is there anything you can do about it? You might be surprised...

 

Courts have generally held that students away at school are still considered to be “family members” under the PP 00 01 and, thus, are covered while operating autos at school. However, there is an important exclusion in the PAP that says [emphasis added]:

 

B. We do not provide Liability Coverage for the ownership, maintenance or use of:

3. Any vehicle, other than “your covered auto”,

   which is:

    a. Owned by any “family member”; or

    b. Furnished or available for the regular use of

        any “family member”.

However, this Exclusion (B.3.) does not apply to you while you are maintaining or “occupying” any vehicle which is:

    a. Owned by a “family member”; or

    b. Furnished or available for the regular use of

        a “family member”.

 

As you can see, IF the vehicle is “furnished or available” for the “regular use” of a “family member,” there is no coverage under the parents’ policy while the student drives the car. Without debating the issues of “furnished or available” or “regular use,” let’s assume that the student does have regular, unrestricted access to her roommate’s car. In that case, she is at the mercy of the insurance on the vehicle, if any, since her parents’ policy will not provide any coverage. Is there anything her parents can do do extend coverage to her under their policy while driving her roommate’s car? Well, speaking of the word “extend”...

 

ISO has an endorsement, the PP 03 06-Extended Non-Owned Coverage-Vehicles Furnished or Available For Regular Use that may provide coverage. If you’ll open this endorsement, you’ll see that it buys back several exclusions, including B.3. above. However, note the following wording from the endorsement [emphasis added]:

 

I. Extended Non-owned Coverage


The Extended Non-owned Coverage provided by this endorsement does not afford coverage under Part A and Part B of the Policy for any accident involving:


A. A vehicle owned by an individual named in the Schedule or in the Declarations;


B. A vehicle owned by a “family member” or


C. A temporary substitute vehicle for such owned vehicle described in A. or B. above.

 

So, even though this endorsement provides coverage to family members for vehicles furnished or available for their regular use, it does not provide coverage IF the vehicle is owned “by a member of the same household.” Exclusion B.3. in the PAP applies to vehicles owned by family members but not scheduled on the parents’ policy and also to vehicles furnished or available for the regular use of family members (e.g., a company car). What Item I. in the endorsement means is that the coverage provided by the endorsement only buys back the “furnished or available” part of Exclusion B.3. and coverage still does not apply to vehicles owned by a member of the same household. How does this apply to the college roommate situation?

 

On at least one occasion (and probably more), a claim involving a college student’s roommate’s car was denied under the PP 03 06. According to the insurer, the roommate was a “member of the same household.” But, is this true? Do two college student sharing a dorm room constitute a “household?”  In deciding the coverage issue, we must examine what is meant by a “household.”

 

According to Black’s Law Dictionary [emphasis added]:

 

Household, n.  A family living together.  Those who dwell under the same roof and compose a family.   Term is generally synonymous with “family” for insurance purposes, and includes those who dwell together as a family under the same roof.  Generally, the term as used in automobile policies is synonymous with “home” and “family.”

 

The Black’s Law discussion of “family” indicates that it is comprised of blood relatives or a close-knit social unit with a high degree or permanency, living under the control of one head of the household. I don’t think two people who possibly had never met before, spending a few months together as roommates, but otherwise being independent of each other, constitutes a family or household...i.e., just because two people share a room doesn’t make them a “household.”

 

What if it’s not her roommate that makes the auto regularly available, but her best friend across the hallway? Clearly, in this case, coverage applies since they aren’t roommates...or does the entire dormitory constitute a “household?” What if we’re talking about a sorority or fraternity where there is (at least theoretically) more of a “family” than a dormitory setting?

 

Clearly, there are no easy answers. So, the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with the company underwriter in advance. What do you think?

Tags:  insuring Wisconsin  personal lines  personal lines coverage  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)