Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
The IIAW Blog
Blog Home All Blogs

Sales - How Promoting Employee Happiness Benefits Everyone

Posted By IIAW Staff, Monday, July 20, 2020
Updated: Thursday, July 9, 2020

 

Employees Collaborating

By: Aggie Alvarez | Caliper

 

This article was originally published in our February 2020 Wisconsin Independent Agent magazine. Click here to see all of our magazines. 

 

Happy employees positively affect workplace operations. Statistics show that companies that foster employee happiness outperform their competitors by 20%. It’s no surprise, then, that some companies are taking more active measures to promote positive employee experiences. 

 

In 2015, Airbnb became one of the most notable companies to tackle the topic of employee happiness by hiring someone whose role was specifically dedicated to managing and improving their employee’s experiences. At the time, they transitioned their Chief Human Resources Officer into their shiny new position, the Head of Employee Experience. 

 

The Head of Employee Experience combines traditional human resources processes and the responsibility of focusing on their new initiative — the “workplace as an experience” vision. Airbnb worked to achieve this vision by creating a group of employees in most offices that worked as a “ground control,” focused on bringing the company’s written culture to life. 

 

So why are companies focusing so much on employee happiness and their experience at work? Beyond ranking well in Forbes’ Best Places to Work List, there are a number of benefits that outweigh the cost of investing in employee happiness. However, most offices can’t afford to hire a Head of Employee Experience. Often, departments delegate responsibilities to a single person or a team of individuals to ensure that tasks don’t fall through the cracks. At the end of the day, you want your employees to be both happy and productive. So, what are you doing to promote their happiness?

 

Productivity, happiness, and your bottom line.

 

A report titled The Financial Impact of a Positive Employee Experience dove into the correlation between financial returns and employee satisfaction in their current role.
It was found that companies who ranked in the top 25% reported nearly three times the return on assets, and doubled their return on sales. These findings make it
clear: Your employee’s experience is not just tied to
happiness, but also productivity throughout the workplace. You can drastically improve your company’s bottom line by increasing your employees’ experiences. A happier workforce is a more productive workforce, which in turn creates a more profitable environment. 

 

If you notice that productivity is low and it seems you’ve done all you can do to promote employee happiness in the workplace, take a look at your hiring practices and see if there needs to be more precision when hiring. Sit down and take the time to assess gaps in your hiring process, and determine ways in which you can improve. Moving forward, this can tremendously impact your employees’ future happiness and productivity.

 

A work-life balance is integral toward fostering a happy workforce. Being able to separate work and personal life provides untethered freedom, allowing employees ample time to unplug and recharge. Finding small, simple ways to promote a healthy work-life balance can help combat burnout and can help your employees feel as though work doesn’t permeate every aspect of their lives. When employees aren’t having to worry about work outside of the office, it increases their drive. Allowing employees to recharge gives them the opportunity to come in with a fresh attitude instead of being bogged down. Having a clear break between life and work is an easy way to promote happiness.

 

Engagement, happiness, and a retained workforce.

 

The average cost-per-hire for companies is $4,129 per new employee, according to Hire by Google’s latest research, and the cost-per-hire of executives is exponentially higher. Recently, the Work Institute looked at trends in employee turnover and predicted that in 2020,  1 out of every 3 workers will leave their current jobs. When it costs nearly
a third of an employee’s salary each time someone leaves their position, it is critical for companies to find ways to engage and retain their current human capital. 

 

Employees are more likely to stay in an organization that offers them opportunities to develop in their professional careers and create meaningful relationships with their coworkers and supervisors. Developing and enforcing friendships can have a great impact on your organization. Work friendships help employees to become more engaged and more innovative. 

 

A highly engaged workforce has resoundingly positive effects on your company. Employees will have higher ratings of profitability, productivity, and satisfaction in their roles. Additionally, a highly engaged workforce is 59% less likely to move onto a new role at a different company. Retaining your top talent will help your bottom line — rather than spending your budget on hiring and onboarding new employees, you can invest in your current workforce at a much more cost-effective rate. Take this cost-savings approach when it comes to factoring in your budget for employee happiness. 

 

Ask your employees for suggestions.

 

Your employees know what they want out of their employer better than anyone else. Take the time to ask why they enjoy their jobs, and what they would like to see changed. Doing so offers valuable insight that you can’t gather anywhere else. The classic “suggestion box” isn’t a groundbreaking tactic, but at its core, it opens up the discussions that are necessary to understanding the mindset of your employees. 

 

Offering your employees the support and opportunity to ask questions and suggest improvements in your organization can serve as a big win for your company. This strategy allows your employees to tap into their resources, technical savvy, and creative expertise. Their suggestions may highlight things you’ve missed in your organization, or uncover tools and resources that your employees need to become more productive and successful in their jobs. 

 

By inviting employees’ best ideas, you are continuing to foster and promote a more collaborative culture that sparks creativity. 

 

It might be strange to envision happiness as something you can offer to your employees, but by tweaking different aspects in your workplace, you can find ways to both not only improve your organization and benefit employees. It’s possible for your employees to be happy and productive in the workplace, and it all starts with active listening and ensuring that your employees feel engaged and valued. 

 

Caliper offers tools and resources that your company can use to assess, track, and improve employee engagement in your workplace. Get started with our scientifically-verified assessment and reports, and see how Caliper can help transform your workforce.

Tags:  caliper  employee  employee benefits  sales 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Big I Buzz - July 15, 2020

Posted By IIAW Staff, Wednesday, July 15, 2020

big i buzz

It's July 15th and we are speeding through the summer. We have a lot of news to cover in this week's Big I Buzz. You can stay up-to-date on all weekly news by subscribing to our email newsletter here.

InsurCon2020 

We have made the difficult decision to delay InsurCon until 2021. We feel strongly that the safety of our members, exhibitors, staff and speakers come first. You can look forward to InsurCon2021 - as it is now scheduled for May 10-11, 2021. We are pleased to share that Joe Theismann will still be a keynote speaker in 2021. You can stay informed on InsurCon20201 updates as we release new information on our website here

Walmart Launches Insurance Business

On July 9th, news broke that Walmart is joining the health insurance industry as an intermediary. In an email statement to CNBC, Walmart confirmed they had created an insurance agency, but their spokesperson, Randy Hargrove, would not share details about the plans it would sell, or the pricing of those plans. Read more from Insurance Business Magazine here

House OKs $1.5 Trillion Infrastructure Plan That Impacts HOS, Insurance

The Moving Forward Act was approved by the House this week and if passed by the Senate, would increase the minimum amount of liability insurance commercial motor vehicles are required to maintain from $750,000 to $2 million. Additionally, if passed the bill would fund projects to fix roads and bridges, upgrade transit system, expand interstate railways and dredge harbors, ports and channels. This bill would also authorize more than $100 billion to expand internet access for rural and low-income communities and $25 billion to modernize the USPS's infrastructure and operations, including new, electric vehicles, according to ttnews.com. 

We hope everyone has a great rest of their week!

Tags:  Big I Buzz  insuring Wisconsin  weekly wisconsin insurance agent newsletter  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Virtual University - I Bet the Named Insured Doesn't Own the Building! Have You Asked?

Posted By IIAW Staff, Monday, July 13, 2020
Updated: Monday, June 29, 2020

Buildings in City

By: Chris Boggs | Big "I" Virtual University Executive Director

 

“Who owns the building?” Asking this rather basic, four-word question can save your insured, you, and your errors and omissions carrier a major heartache and undue costs following a building damage claim.

 

Never assume a small, closely-held corporation is as simple as it appears on the surface. Exposure and legal realities often exist, the importance of which are not fully understood by the “business owner.”

 

Consider the following example, George Bailey owns Widgets, Inc., a manufacturer of widgets (who would have guessed?). The manufacturing operation is conducted in a building that, according to Mr. Bailey, is “owned by the insured.” However, Mr. Bailey owns the building individually.

 

Understand, Mr. Bailey is not attempting to mislead the insurance carrier or misrepresent the facts. In his mind, there is no distinction between the operations of Widgets, Inc. and the ownership of the building. To Mr. Bailey, it’s all the same because he owns both. Such belief is more common than many agents realize.

 

But within the realities of insurance and law, two separate “persons” are involved in this all-too-common situation. Potential insurance coverage gaps arise from the existence and participation of two separate

“persons.” Each natural person and legal person must be accounted for and managed separately within the insurance policy. (Natural persons are flesh and blood individuals. Legal persons are created by the filing of specific legal documents such as articles of incorporation or articles of organization.)

 

Natural persons and legal persons have the same rights; the right to sue, to be sued, to own property, etc. Therefore, each “person” presents his/her/its individual risk exposure that must be analyzed and specifically insured.

 

Unless each person’s exposure is properly addressed, the property policy may not respond to a property

claim for one of two reasons:

 

1. Lack of insurable interest; or

2. Lack of insurance protection.

 

Property insurance policies do NOT respond to a claim if insurable interest does not exist at the time of the loss. Likewise, if the party with insurable interest is not an insured, the policy does NOT pay.

 

Insurable interest, in a property insurance context, exists when a “person” suffers direct financial loss as a result of damage to or destruction of the specified property. If the “person” with insurable interest is not covered by a property policy, the loss must be paid out of that “person’s” resources. Insurable interest in real and personal property is created in one of three ways:

 

1. Ownership;

2. Legal liability: Responsible for someone else’s 

    property – like a dry cleaner is responsible for its 

   customer’s clothes; or

3. Contract: A lease agreement making another party 

    responsible for insuring the property.

 

Returning to the initial scenario: George Bailey owns the building individually, but Widgets, Inc. is the policy’s only named insured. If the building is damaged or destroyed by any covered cause of loss, the property policy covering the building owes – nothing. The legal person listed on the policy as the named insured, Widgets, Inc., did not have insurable interest; and the natural person with insurable interest, George Bailey, is not covered in the policy as an insured.

 

Beyond the individual (natural person) ownership of a building, one of several possible ownership scenarios

could exist that must be considered, anticipated and/or researched, including:

 

1. The building is owned individually by the “owner” of 

    the business operation (as in our example above);

2. The building is owned by several individuals;

3. The building is owned by a separate legal person; or

4. The building is owned by any combination of natural 

    and legal persons.

 

Attorneys often recommend such separation for various reasons. But sometimes, the building is not owned by the named business entity because it was purchased first, willed to the individual, or any number of reasons. Again, never assume ownership.

 

How is building ownership confirmed? The simplest way is to ask the question; specifically, “who or what entity owns the building.” Even Mr. Bailey in our example knows he owns the building individually, he just didn’t see or understand the need to tell the agent. Explain the need.

 

A second method requires individual effort, but it’s quick and painless in most circumstances. Research the county’s online tax, GIS, or other public record system. Most counties offer access to at least one public record. Once the proper site is located, an address search can be done. Depending on the county, massive amounts of building information can be found when such an online search is done:

 

• Year built;

• Square footage;

• Construction (sometimes);

• A photo or footprint drawing; and

• Who owns the building.

 

Once you become familiar with a particular county’s website, these searches can be conducted in a matter of minutes. A few minutes of work to save thousands of dollars in uncovered claims, E&O deductibles, and court time seems like a fair trade.

 

Managing and insuring the separate ownership exposure is the delicate and tricky part. Since the same “person” or groups of persons who/that own the operation also own the building, it is unlikely they will want to purchase a separate Lessors Risk Only (LRO) policy, which is an option.

 

In most “common ownership” situations presented previously, the owner(s) want the building insured on the same policy as the operation. Two main methods to accomplish this are:

 

1. Name the building owner as a named insured; or

2. Legally lease the building to the business. Naming the building owner as a named insured. As simple as this seems, this is often an improper or unavailable option – especially if that person (natural or legal) is involved in other ventures or activities. Remember, the specific operation was underwritten and adding named insureds has the possibility of extended protection to unintended or unexpected exposures.

 

Many underwriters are unwilling to extended what is  essentially LRO coverage in a package policy because of the uncertainty surrounding the breadth of the building owner’s operations. Underwriters may also be unwilling to add the additional named insured because it may own several building or be involved in other operations.

 

Legally lease the building to the business (named insured operation). This is the most proper way to manage and cover the building owner’s exposure. Remember, insurable interest can be created by contract. The lease agreement can and should be used to create insurable interest by making the tenant operation responsible for insuring the building. Once the tenant has insurable interest by legal contract, the building is properly covered and the building owner’s exposure can be protected by attaching specific endorsements:

 

• CP 12 19 Additional Insured – Building Owner: This is 

   a property endorsement extending property coverage 

   to the named building owner; and

• CG 20 11 Additional Insured – Managers or Lessors of 

   Premises: A general liability endorsement extending 

   additional insured status to the building lessor/owner.

 

Creating a proper lease and attaching the proper endorsements extends the necessary protection to the building owner without the need of a separate policy. This is also the best option because many underwriters are unwilling to add the building owner as a named insured on the operation’s (Widgets, Inc.) policy.

 

To end, never assume building ownership. Always ask what seems like a “duh” question. If the question isn’t asked, research ownership through the county’s website. Once ownership is known, insure the exposure.

Tags:  insuring Wisconsin  named insured  ownership  Virtual University  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Wisconsin 2020 Partisan Elections Take Shape

Posted By IIAW Staff, Friday, July 10, 2020
Updated: Monday, June 29, 2020

Wisconsin 2020

 

By: Misha Lee | IIAW Lobbyist

 

Despite unique challenges for candidates brought on by Coronavirus, the 2020 Wisconsin partisan elections, both primary (Tuesday, August 11th) and general (Tuesday, November 3rd), are beginning to take shape. June 1st was the deadline for all candidates to file nomination papers in order to get on the ballot. Depending on the level of office, the minimum number of signatures required varies from 200 to 2,000. Those candidates who filed nomination papers will appear on the ballot unless they did not turn in sufficient signatures to qualify or if some of their signatures are challenged and dismissed leaving them with inadequate signatures to obtain ballot access. The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) meets on June 10th to certify candidates and will also review information on any ballot access issues or challenges of certain candidates.

 

In summary of the 2020 electoral landscape, there are a total of 21 open seats (10 Republicans, 11 Democrats) where incumbents have either announced they are not running for re-election or are running for a different office. Of those, one-third of them are current members of the 33-member State Senate. The Senate will be a much different looking body next year. Spring 2020 brought about the unexpected announcement from State Sen. Fred Risser (D-Madison), America’s longest serving state lawmaker in history, that he will retire after a historic 64-year run serving in the legislature.

 

 

Six other members of the State Senate will be leaving at year’s end, including State Sen. Dave Craig (R-Big Bend, chairman of the Senate

Insurance Committee, Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald who is running for Congress, and longtime insurance industry ally, State Sen. Luther Olsen (R-Ripon). Eighteen incumbent lawmakers have no opponent in their re-elections (11 Republicans, 7 Democrat); 4 legislators will only have a primary election (2 Republican, 2 Democrat); 68 legislators have a general election only; 33 districts have both a primary and a general election and 10 seats have a 3rd party candidate also running.

 

See an unofficial list of all candidates at https://bit.ly/JulyGovAffairs.

 

The 2020 elections are sure to be historic with a hotly contested Presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden setting the stage at the top of the ticket. Even more unprecedented for candidates and voters alike will be the unique nature of these elections in particular amid concerns over COVID-19.

 

Already, many events around the state have been cancelled and customary campaign tactics and strategies put on hold which pose challenges for candidates to be able to effectively reach voters. National and state polls this early are likely to be inaccurate indicators of what will happen on election day. But what does remain to be seen is what will the mood of the electorate be come August and November and how will it impact challenger candidates versus incumbents.

Tags:  2020 elections  coronavirus  elections  government affairs  insuring Wisconsin  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Virtual University - Property Damage: Is it "Property Damage" Just Because a Jurisdictional Order Uses the Term "Property Damage"?

Posted By IIAW Staff, Thursday, July 9, 2020
Updated: Monday, June 29, 2020

Virus & Hands

 

By: Chris Boggs | Big "I" Virtual University Executive Director

 

Some plaintiff attorneys are almost giddy over the fact that several jurisdictions used the term “property damage” in their respective emergency declarations to justify closing “non-essential” businesses. These attorneys are hopeful that such wording gives them the ability to trigger a business income claim. Given the facts as that have developed since the situation began and those that are continuing to develop, pinning any hopes on such wording appears futile (but it’s entertaining to watch).

 

Insurance Journal’s article “Business Interruption Claimants Like How Some Localities Worded Emergency Orders,” introduced this discussion, but it doesn’t address the question, does the government calling the presence of a virus on a surface “property damage” factually make it property damage? Does stating something is blue in an emergency declaration make it blue?

 

Neither local, municipal nor executive orders appear to carry the force of a law, nor is it likely such orders change the facts of physical science. Property damage and what constitutes property damage is not dependent on terms used in an order intended to close businesses not seen as essential to the public good (other than the “public” who happens to own the shuttered businesses). 

 

Examples of these orders appear to be limited to counties or local orders rather than statewide orders. Orders applying “property damage” wording often read similar to this from New Orleans’ second order:

 

• Whereas, there is reason to believe that COVID-19 may be spread amongst the population by various means of exposure, including the propensity to spread person to person and the propensity to attach to surfaces for prolonged periods of time, thereby spreading from surface to person and causing property loss and damage in certain circumstances.....

 

Obviously, certain assumptions were made in the crafting of these declarations. The first is that the virus has a “propensity to attach to surfaces for prolonged periods of time.” This has since proven to be incorrect. A University of Alabama study published in the New England Journal of Medicine stated that the maximum amount of time the virus can live on certain surfaces is up to three days. Further, the CDC states that property to person infection is not a primary cause of infection.

 

Given this, the first presumption appears to be incorrect - lessening the effect of this hoped-for lifeline towards providing property damage. 

 

Second, the more disappointing for plaintiff attorneys, simply saying something causes property damage does not change the requirements of physical science. “Damage” is generally understood to mean a physical change in condition such that repair is required. In the case of the presence of a virus, what repair is required? The only possible type of required “repair” is cleaning the surface or the loss of the virus’ viability.

 

Additionally, the business income form requires more than just “damage” to trigger coverage, there must be “direct physical loss of or damage to property.” This is more than simply saying, “hey, there is damage.” The Big I through its Virtual University has penned several articles detailing the specifics of business income and what is required to trigger coverage. 

 

Lastly, the jurisdictional authorities seem to have hedged their bets with the closing phrase, “in certain circumstances.”

 

Simply, such wording in these executive orders does not appear to provide any benefit to the plaintiff attorneys. Improper assumptions and declaring a “fact” without evidence or the support of physical science does not change the reality. After all, if the executive order said the sky was green, that would not make it green.

Tags:  COVID-19  insuring Wisconsin  property damage  virtual university  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Errors & Omissions - And You Call Yourself an Expert!

Posted By IIAW Staff, Wednesday, July 8, 2020
Updated: Tuesday, June 23, 2020

expert sitting at desk

By: Chris Boggs | Big "I" Virtual University Executive Director

 

This article was originally featured in our July Wisconsin Independent Agent Magazine. Read the full issue here

 

An insurtech firm I prefer not to name, other than to say they think they are geniuses when it comes to policies, was founded by two people who believed purchasing insurance was too frustrating. In fact, their website specifically states, “Navigating the world of insurance is confusing, stressful and a step backward in time....”

 

Because the founders were “consultants to the top insurance companies,” they knew there had to be a better way for consumers to purchase insurance. Their stated mission is help consumers get the insurance they need and feel good about what they got. Sort of sounds like something an agent does, but that’s not the point of this article. 

 

Towards this goal, the firm publishes consumer-facing articles. I recently read through several of the articles and felt they were relatively well written for consumer consumption and largely correct. What disappointed me was the “level” of credit they gave the writers; each writer was listed as, “Insurance Expert. 

 

The title “insurance expert” caught my eye - in a big way. It stands to reason that obviously these writers have many years of insurance experience since they are “experts” Uh, they didn’t. Here are partial bios as examples: 

 

• [Author’s name redacted[ is an Insurance Editor at [Insuretech name removed] in New York City and an expert in homeowners insurance. Previously, he was working as a freelance writer for the  New York State Nurses Association and wrote for the Michigan 

Information Research Service. [Writer] has a B.A. in journalism from [University Name Redacted.]

• [Author’s name redacted] is the Associate Director of SEO Content at [Insuretech] in New York City. His writing on insurance and personal finance has appeared on Betterment, Inc, Credit Sesame, and the Council for Disability Awareness. [Writer] has a degree in English from the [University name removed].

• [Author’s name redacted[ is the co-founder of [Website name removed], a groundbreaking personal finance site for millennials that was named one of Time’s 25 Best Blogs of 2012. [Author’s] work has been published in New York Magazine, Glamour, The Guardian, BuzzFeed and more.

 

Am I missing something? Would the background of ANY of these writers qualify them to be considered an “insurance expert”? I don’t think it does, but the public doesn’t know any better. Calling yourself an expert doesn’t make it so. 

 

Unfortunately, the combination of missing or incorrect policy information and the misappropriation of the title “insurance expert” pushed me to send a rather 

“snotty” email to this group. As of this writing, I have not received a response. Would you like to see what I wrote? Before you read it, remember, I’ve already 

acknowledged I was a bit pompous. With that as prologue, what follows is a slightly edited version of my email.

 

I was reading through several of your homeowners’ and personal auto insurance coverage articles today and wanted to get in touch with you.

 

Yes, insurance can be confusing to those not in the business, but there is a way to explain it so the uninitiated can easily and quickly grasp its concepts and realities.

 

Secondly, I would be very careful calling anyone an “insurance expert” unless he/she has many years of experience in the insurance business - and is well-versed in insurance coverages and concepts. Writing ABOUT insurance in newspapers and blogs doesn’t make someone an insurance expert; neither does being in the financial and investment business. Property and casualty insurance is far more complicated than can be known just writing about insurance. You have to be “covered in the mud of an insurance policy,” you have to have actually read the policy from cover to cover, several times, and you have to know how deep the depths of insurance really are before you can begin to be considered an expert.

 

Further, a true expert doesn’t consider himself or herself an expert. In fact, those who truly do qualify as experts quickly shy away from being called experts; the reason, because they are so well versed in insurance, they know there is far more to know than they already do. Any person who calls or truly believes he or she is an expert doesn’t know what he/she doesn’t know.

 

Someone holding himself or herself out as an “expert” without the credentials to back it up is dishonest and harmful to those depending on the information the so-called “expert” has provided.

 

So, my recommendations are: correct the incorrect information; and don’t refer to anyone as an insurance expert who doesn’t have the necessary time and training to qualify as one.

 

Just my personal recommendations to you; take them or leave them as you so desire. 

 

OK, I realize I let my emotions get the best of me. I also realize nothing I said will change their attitude or actions. And lastly, I know that “insurance expert” is just their way to market their “brilliance.” But it needed to be said. 

 

But this is what I find truly interesting, they note on their site that the information they provide should not be relied upon; in fact, they intimate that agents are the better source of information. Here is the disclaimer: 

 

[Insuretech’s name withheld] editorial content is not written by an insurance agent. It’s intended for informational purposes and should not be considered legal or financial advice. Consult a professional to learn what financial products are right for you.

 

I take certain satisfaction in this disclaimer. Evidently, their “insurance experts” are not as valuable as  insurance agents.

 

Here are some thoughts about being an “expert” of any kind.

 

• True experts worry more about what they don’t know than what they do know, continually looking for ways to fill their knowledge gap. Self-proclaimed experts ignore the breadth of what they don’t know and are satisfied (mainly because they don’t know what they don’t know). 

 

• True experts are rarely absolutely certain. Self-proclaimed experts are rarely in doubt.

 

• True experts admire other experts and desire to learn from them. Self-proclaimed experts don’t see anyone else as an expert, feeling others have nothing to offer. 

 

• True experts listen to and value the opinions and advice of others. Self-proclaimed experts think theirs is the only opinion that matters. 

 

• True experts openly admit when they don’t know the answers. Self-proclaimed experts ALWAYS know the answer - even when they don’t.. 

 

• True experts apply the experience learned from past accomplishments to accomplish more. Self-proclaimed experts rest on past accomplishments. 

 

• True experts don’t really like being referred to as experts. Self-proclaimed experts revel in such an introduction.

 

• True experts desire to give all their knowledge away so others can be better. Self-proclaimed experts hold on to their knowledge so others have to come to them. 

 

• True experts do not proclaim themselves experts - others do. Self-proclaimed experts use the term as a marketing ploy. 

 

• Be wary of anyone who eagerly takes on the mantle of “expert,” they probably aren’t. If you call yourself an “expert,” you probably aren’t. 

 

One last thought, if the word “expert” is used anywhere on your website or in your marketing, you better be one because that is the standard/expectation that you have set. Afterall, who do you expect more from, the apprentice of journeyman electrician or the master electrician? The best course of action is to take the term “expert” off all websites and marketing materials.

 

When you are an expert, you won’t feel like one. If you feel like one, you aren’t one. The more you know, the more you realize you don’t know. And people who don’t know, aren’t experts - at least in their minds. 

Tags:  E&O Risk Management  errors and omissions  insuring Wisconsin  insurtech  wisconsin independent agent  wisconsin independent agent association  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Marketing: Implementing a Multi-Modality Marketing Approach for Commercial Lines

Posted By IIAW Staff, Wednesday, July 8, 2020
Updated: Monday, June 29, 2020

 

By: Larry Neilson, CEO | Neilson Marketing Services

 

As an agent, right now could be the best time ever to begin a marketing effort to organically grow your commercial lines book of business. We are just coming out of two to three months of the most monumental government shutdown of commerce in history. There are still disagreements over whether the recovery will be V, U, or L-shaped but early indicators from the airline and hospitality industries coupled with the most recent jobless-rate drop and payroll gains are encouraging.  

 

Additionally, businesses receiving renewal notices are experiencing some of the biggest premium increases they have seen in years. The market is continuing to harden with a generation of producers who has never experienced this cycle before. They are going through the renewal process with a business-as-usual approach, not realizing these premium increases should be viewed as an invitation to ask prospects to seek an alternative. How do we know? For one thing, we are seeing among our own agency clients a considerable uptick in lead conversions as a result of today’s market. 

 

Many agents, however, are wary of getting started too soon and have more of a “let’s wait and see what happens” point of view, regardless of the hard market opportunity. But while those agents wait, the larger brokers are moving to get started with their marketing plans that include a multi-prong strategy. 

 

Upping the Marketing Game

 

Multi-modality marketing encompasses digital marketing, demand-generation marketing, and social media. It all begins with your brand and website, which should be carefully analyzed to determine if the site is doing what you need it to do:

• Does your website truly reflect your brand, tell your story – what distinguishes you in the marketplace, why and how can you make a difference in a client’s insurance protection?

• Is your website optimized properly so that you can be found by people who don’t necessarily know your name?

• Is your site properly programmed/coded to provide an enriched user experience across all devices, particularly because mobile devices now account for nearly 57% of Internet traffic?

• Is your site ADA-compliant?

• Are your social media channels set up to thematically align with your website and brand?

• Do you have an organized purposeful content and link-building plan in place? Are you regularly blogging, producing white papers (on why the hard market exists and what it means to business owners, for example), case studies (successful placement of tough accounts), and other share your expertise and thought leadership, especially salient in challenging times?

 

Once your website and social media platforms are thoroughly reviewed and you have made the necessary changes, which may involve anything from implementing minor adjustments to a total site revamp, the next step is to leverage available data. Identify your prospect base by class of business, minimum employee size and geographic boundaries. Append as much data as you can, including multiple C-suite contacts with emails, phone numbers, and workers compensation X-dates if they are available in your state, to begin prospecting.

 

Set up a demand-generation email program. This involves creating an email-funnel strategy to attract, engage and convert prospects to customers. An email funnel will help you get your potential

customers from point A to B, step-by-step, and influence them along the way toward your conversion goal. One you have your strategy in place, design, write and launch the campaign.

 

Boost your campaign with outbound calling. Using a demand-generation marketing platform that utilizes content and reciprocity to create a funnel in conjunction with outbound calling is a way to increase the likelihood of connecting with prospects and obtaining greater conversions.

 

A good demand-generation software program uses touch points to score leads as they move through the top of the sales funnel from list to leads, qualified leads, and closes. Leads that score over a certain number can be contacted by phone to set up an appointment either virtually or face-to-face. Knowing who to call reduces cold call labor considerably and improves lead quality. Simultaneously, a beacon (which provides on-demand FAQs, chat, and an email contact rolled into one helpful widget) on your website tracks visitors, and banner ads can be used to target them on LinkedIn. Some of the top software provides include HubSpot, Pardot, SharpSpring, Marketo, and Act-On.

 

During this hard market it’s important to get ahead of renewals well in advance for an opportunity to provide potential clients with options in terms of pricing, coverage terms, and capacity. The combination of a

well-optimized website, consistent content (blogs and social media posts), a demand-generation email effort and telemarketing outreach will help you build your brand and develop a consistent lead flow to gain new customers in this market cycle. 

 

 

Larry Neilson is CEO, Neilson Marketing Services, an insurance marketing firm founded in 1988, and provide more than 5,000 professionals with data, outbound, digital, SEO, content, social media and email services. 

Tags:  ADA compliance  digital marketing  email program  iiaw  insuring Wisconsin  marketing  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Agency Operations - Top 3 Tools You Need to Manage Remote Workers

Posted By IIAW Staff, Monday, July 6, 2020
Updated: Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Virtual Team Meeting

By: WAHVE Work at Home Vintage Experts 

 

This article was originally featured in our July Wisconsin Independent Agent Magazine. Click here to read the full issue. 

 

Today’s employees Zoom, Skype, Jabber, FaceTime, GoToMeetings and chat in Google Hangouts and Webexes. When they’re not videoconferencing, they’re emailing, collaborating in Microsoft Teams, and instant chatting on Slack. They’ve already got the tech tools they need to make it easy and more convenient to work remotely, but do you have the right management tools in place to keep your remote employees engaged?

 

There’s no doubt that hiring remote employees can benefit your insurance business by bringing in critical skills that you don’t have or can’t easily find. Remote workers can be a boon to recruiting, productivity, business continuity, and improved customer service. But relying on a traditional management style to keep a dispersed workforce motivated and moving forward won’t cut it.

 

So, what are the best ways to keep employees you rarely see motivated? 

 

Build a Virtual Water Cooler

 

The cornerstone to keeping remote employees engaged is proactive communication. When you can’t simply stop by an employee’s desk to chat, grab a cup of coffee, or 

physically sit with them in a conference room, it’s important to make a concentrated effort to make time for casual conversation. It’s not enough to schedule a few

one-hour meetings per week. Communication with remote employees should be fluid, spontaneous and regular. Create a virtual water cooler by continually chatting with people to find out what they did during the weekend, how their family is doing, and what their plans are for time away from work. 

 

Establish Some “WAHVY Gravy”

When employees are out of sight, it can be easy to unintentionally exclude them, making them feel isolated. And when people feel isolated and not a part of the work

community, productivity suffers.

 

Go beyond relying on virtual meetings to establish community. If you have an intranet, create a space where people can share news, tips, or pictures of their pets. Many companies dedicate specific Slack channels to support socializing.  Others use virtual coffee breaks, book clubs, TED talks, or online learning courses that everyone participates in to encourage a deeper sense of community.

 

Another strategy is to incorporate a few minutes for team members to share something personal at the end of meetings. At WAHVE, we call this “WAHVY gravy.” We ask people to share something that’s important to them – whether it be pictures of their artwork, hobbies, or stories about recent vacations. Another idea is to ask employees to share an “ah ha” or an “appreciation” – something they recently learned or someone they’d like to acknowledge. The important thing is to make it fun and personal. This changes how people interact with each other at a human level and builds interest and empathy for one another.

 

Don’t Forget Face Time

 

Despite all of the fancy tech tools, there’s still no substitute for face time. When you’re managing a remote team, no matter the size, it’s important to bring the entire team together when you can. Doing this shows on site and remote workers how much you appreciate them, and it builds connection. At WAHVE, we bring our staff together

bi-annually, and we find that these events are invaluable to help the team bond, strengthen our culture, and share goals and future direction with everyone physically present.  

 

According to an analysis by FlexJobs and Global Workplace Analytics, remote work has grown 44% over the last five years and 91% over the past 10 years. It’s a trend that will likely continue to rise, so there’s no time like the present to adapt your management style to support remote workers, and in turn, the success of your business.

Tags:  agency operations  COVID-19  digital agency  insuring Wisconsin  remote work  virtual teams  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog  work from home 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Risky Business - Stepping Up To The Plate

Posted By IIAW Staff, Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Updated: Monday, June 22, 2020

baseball in grass

As I sat tasked with the responsibility to write an article for our Membership Edition of the Wisconsin Independent Agent, I was trying to determine how I wanted to portray an IIAW membership. Like any mediocre writer, I started with what I know. I know that I love my job and the support we provide our members. I know that there are members who we need to connect with more. And I know there are independent agents who would find value in our organization and we have yet to connect with. 

 

And I know baseball. 

 

Across the nation, people young and old are stepping back up to the plate. Not just the actual home plate on the baseball field, but the metaphoric plate of life. 

 

The Independent Insurance Agents of Wisconsin resembles a baseball team - a really strong one that has been around for a long time. 

 

We have the front office. A team of dedicated professionals who are on the clock 24/7 making sure that the Association is up-to-date on the latest news, changes and information. That we are making the trip to the capital building when there needs to be a voice on the floor. That we are showing up to the games and practices and listening to what the players want. And that we never leave someone behind or feeling like they don’t have somewhere to turn for help.

 

“Surround yourself with people who will leap out of the dugout should you ever charge the mound.”

 

We have dedicated companies, brokers and vendors. The non-agency members who show their support for the independent agencies channel do so by being part of our committees, by attending our events and by financially supporting the IIAW. We would not be as strong as we are today without those vital organizations.

 

The way a team plays as a whole determines its success. You may have the greatest bunch of individual starts in the world, but if they don’t play together the club won’t be worth a dime.” 

- Babe Ruth

 

The team of independent insurance agents who represent the IIAW is a team I couldn’t be prouder of. 

When crisis hit, agents came together to learn from one another and show support. 

 

I see this continuing in the future so that everyone can grow and experience success. The IIAW may have created the club, but it is the players who have made it great. Utilizing the tools and resources made available to them has allowed agencies to focus on their business and show the value of an independent agent.

 

Character isn’t defined by the moments when you’re up 3-0, but instead by how you battle when you’re 

down 0-2. 

 

The IIAW battled and will continue to battle no matter what pitch is thrown to us. At the end of the day, our passion and dedication for the independent agency channel drives everything we do. We promise to continue to find new ways to support the independent agent. We will work with our supporting company members to drive innovative solutions and offer them at little-to-no-cost to our members. 

 

Thank you for believing in us and being part of the team. Let’s root for each other and see how we all grow. 

 

Tags:  iiaw  membership renewal  risky business  wisconsin independent agent association  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance blog 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Commentary from Counsel - Update: Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Agent E&O Win, Strengthens Future Defenses

Posted By Kaylyn Zielinski, Monday, June 29, 2020

Gavel

By: Josh Johanningmeier | IIAW General Counsel 

 

On May 21, 2020, in Emer’s Camper Corral v. Alderman, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a 6-1 majority opinion confirming a rigorous causation standard for negligent procurement E&O claims.  The Court ultimately found that, in order to prevail on a claim for negligent procurement of an insurance policy, an insured must show that the promised policy was commercially available to them.  While this decision is undoubtedly a win for agents, it is critical that you take care when communicating with clients. 

 

The Emer’s Camper Corral Case and Decision 

 

Since 2004, Rhonda Emer and her husband have sold new and used camper trailers under the trade name Camper Corral.  Not long after founding the business, the Emers began purchasing Camper Corral’s insurance through the defendant insurance agency.  Starting in 2007, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin insured Camper Corral.  However, before the commencement of the 2012-13 policy year, General Casualty sent Camper Corral a nonrenewal notice after two consecutive years with at least $100,000 in hail damage claims.  

 

Following the nonrenewal, the Emers worked with their agent to obtain insurance through Western Heritage Insurance Company.  The 2012-13 policy had a $5,000 deductible for hail damage per camper.  However, the agent told the Emers that, if they could go claim free for two years, he may be able to negotiate the hail damage deductible down to $1,000 per camper.  After two claim free years, the agent contacted the Emers with the news that he had obtained a policy from Western Heritage with a $1,000 deductible per camper for hail damage and a $5,000 aggregate deductible limit.  In reality, the Western Heritage policy the Emers ultimately purchased had a $5,000 deductible per camper for hail damage with no aggregate deductible limit.

 

In September of 2014, another hail storm swept over the Camper Corral lot.  This storm damaged 25 of the campers in the Emers’ inventory.  Because of the actual terms of the Western Heritage policy, the Emers’ deductible amounted to $125,000.  As a result, the Emers sued the agent for negligence, suggesting he had breached his duty to them by failing to adequately describe the terms of the Western Heritage policy.  For damages, the Emers asked for $120,000, i.e., the difference between their deductible and the $5,000 aggregate deductible they were promised.

The case ultimately went to trial.  However, before the jury could deliberate, the agent moved for a directed verdict, arguing the Emers had not satisfied their evidentiary burden.  The trial court agreed, ruling that, without evidence that the policy promised to the Emers was commercially available to them (and not just generally available in the marketplace), they could not prevail on their negligence claim.  The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, and the Emers appealed the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

 

According to the State Supreme Court, to prevail on their negligence claim against the agent, the Emers needed to prove four well-settled elements: “(1) [the agent’s] duty of care to Camper Corral; (2) [the agent’s] breach of that duty; (3) injury caused by [the agent’s] breach; and (4) actual loss or damage resulting from the injury.”  However, the only issue left for the Supreme Court to decide was the third: causation.

 

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ultimately held that the Emers had not provided sufficient evidence to satisfy the causation standard.  In their arguments before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the Emers suggested they only needed to prove that a policy like the one they were promised was commercially available.  The Supreme Court, though, found that was one step short.  Not only did the Emers have to prove that the relevant policy was available in the marketplace, but they also had to show that the policy was commercially available to their business.  Put differently, “[w]hether the unavailability is general, or instead particular to Camper Corral, the policy’s unavailability exists independently of any negligence on behalf of the broker.”  Thus, as the Emers did not show that the policy promised to them by the agent was commercially available to their business, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s directed verdict in the agent’s favor.

 

Now What? 

 

This decision is a big win for both insurance agents and E&O carriers defending claims under Wisconsin law.  With the additional burden of having to prove specific availability in negligent procurement cases, agents will see fewer judgments against them and, as a result, fewer lawsuits brought in the first place.  Further, only one Justice dissented in the Camper Corral case.  Thus, even as the makeup of the Court shifts slightly over the next few months, this decision is likely to remain binding precedent well into the future.

 

With this in mind, you should still see this case as a cautionary tale.  Sure, the case ended with a positive result for both the defendant agent, the E&O carrier and insurance agencies around Wisconsin.  But, it took a full trial and appeals all the way to Wisconsin’s highest court to achieve that result.  It is essential that you take great care when marketing policies to your clients.  Doing so will likely save you the hassle of expensive litigation. 

 

Conclusion

 

Ultimately, the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Emer’s Camper Corral v. Alderman is a huge win for insurance agents and E&O carriers around the state.  This will undoubtedly result in fewer negligent procurement cases brought against agents and stronger defenses in some of the cases and claims that are brought by disappointed insureds.  We will keep an eye on the application of this stringent causation standard—it may well cross Wisconsin’s borders into other states.

Tags:  government affairs  insuring Wisconsin  wisconsin independent insurance association  wisconsin insurance agency help  wisconsin insurance blog  wisconsin supreme court 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 40 of 43
 |<   <<   <  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43